MediaWiki

The wiki software behind Wikipedia, for large shared knowledge bases.

GPL-2.0-or-laterStrong copyleft

Building on it: what may you do?

Short answers based on the licence, for the version in the catalog.

  • B1 Change the code for internal use in your company Yes Yes, as long as you don't distribute it.
  • B2 Build your own product or service on top and offer it to customers as SaaS Yes Yes. Running it as a service is not distribution.
  • B3 Make a closed-source derivative and sell or distribute it No No. If you distribute it, the whole work must carry the same licence, with source.
  • B4 Use the project's name and trademark No No, not without permission. The licence covers the code, not the name or logo.

This is guidance, not legal advice. Check with a lawyer before deciding.

The licence in brief

GNU GPL 2.0 or later (GPL-2.0-or-later)

Strong copyleft. Free to run internally and as a service. If you distribute it (modified or not), the whole work must be GPL with source.

What does GPL-2.0-or-later mean?

This is guidance, not legal advice (inte juridisk rådgivning). Check with a lawyer before deciding.

Facts

Licence
GPL-2.0-or-later
Licence type
Strong copyleft
Open core
No
GitHub stars
5.2k
Latest activity
Deployment
Server
Login/SSO
LDAP, OIDC
API
Unknown
Multi-tenant
Unknown
EU vendor
Unknown
Source
GitHub API, fetched 2026-10-03

Licence analysis per use case

Sign in to see what the licence means for eight use cases – from internal self-hosting to offering the tool as a service.

Sign in

Alternative to